Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.183 of 2020, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 34 I.P.C., Police Station Bisrakh , District Gautam Buddh Nagar.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant and informant are the neighbours. As per FIR version, during quarrel, sudden incident was caused by the applicant. Three persons were named in the FIR. The co-accused Kapil Yadav has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.21691 of 2020, vide order dated 20.8.2020. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.It is next submitted that the applicant, having no criminal history, is languishing in jail since 12.3.2020.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that applicant is the main assailant and caused injury to the victim, who was admitted on the date of the incident and discharged on 16.3.2020, therefore, he does not deserve any benevolence.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, sudden incident being caused, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Sachin Yadev involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence and pressurize the witnesses during trial.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 16.4.2021 m.a.