Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sachin Singhal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38747 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sachin Singhal And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Upadhyay,Kamleshwar Singh,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Santosh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 2.8.2017 passed by the Hapur Development Authority as well as against the order dated 20.5.2019 passed by the Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut.
The orders have been passed under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as, 'Act, 1973) and the petitioner has a remedy to file revision under Section 41 of the Act, 1973.
In view of the availability of alternative remedy to the petitioner, it is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is
dismissed.
The petitioner may file revision under Section 41 of the Act, 1973.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Anurag/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sachin Singhal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Salil Kumar Rai
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Upadhyay Kamleshwar Singh Vinod Kumar Upadhyay