Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sabhapati Ram Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50312 of 2003 Petitioner :- Sabhapati Ram Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioners.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:
“i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 12.09.2003, passed by the respondent No.3 (Annexure-3) ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the functioning of petitioners are Plant Protection Supervisor, Grade-III, Raja Talab, Varanasi.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioners are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioners have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sabhapati Ram Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Sharma