Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Sabbineni Butchiramaiah vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Telangana|13 August, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.22317 of 2014 DATE: 13.08.2014 Between:
Sabbineni Butchiramaiah, s/o. Sri Ramulu, Aged about 60 years, r/o. Challapalli, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.
AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
.. Petitioner .. Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.22317 of 2014 ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader for respondents submit that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered by the earlier decision of this Court in W.P.No.4673 of 2014, dated 20.03.2014.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the land to an extent of 511 square yards in R.S.No.294/1 of Challapalli Village, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District. The land was purchased in the year 1991 and petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the said property. When petitioner requested to receive and process the deed of conveyance, the Sub-Registrar, Challapalli (2nd respondent) vide his endorsement dated 21.07.2014 informed the petitioner that the land is classified in the revenue records as prohibited property (gramakantam) and hence, no market value can be furnished to the petitioner. Aggrieved thereby, this writ petition is instituted.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property of the petitioner is a private land. The objection raised by the respondents is illegal. Learned counsel further submits that even assuming that the classification of the land is “Poramboku Grama Kantam”, it cannot automatically treat as Government land and there is no prohibition from alienation of the said property even if it is classified as ‘Grama Kantam’.
4. In the earlier writ petition, on instructions, learned Government Pleader submitted that the land was classified as ‘Grama Kantam’ in the revenue records and, therefore, cannot be processed for registration.
5. No statutory provision is brought to my notice which prohibit sale of property standing in the name of a particular person, which is classified in the revenue records as Gramakantam. It is appropriate to notice provision in Section 2(1) of the A.P.Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Section 2(1) of the Act, describes which are to be treated as Government property. Section read as under:
Section 2. Right of property in public roads, etc., water and lands:-
(1) All public roads, streets, lanes and paths, the bridges, ditches, dikes and fences, on or beside the same, the bed of the sea and of harbours and creeks below high water mark, and of rivers, streams, nalas, lakes, and tanks, and all canals and water-courses, and all standing and flowing water, and all lands, whenever situated, save in so far as the same are the property,-
(a) of any zamindar, poligar, mittadar, jagirdars, shortriemdar or any person claiming thorough or holding under any of them, or
(b) of any, person paying shist, kattubadi, jodi, poruppu or quit-rent to any of the aforesaid persons, or
(c) of any person holding under ryotwari tenure or in any way subject to the payment of land revenue direct to Government, or
(d) of any other registered holder of land in proprietary right, or
(e) of any other person holding land under grant from the Government otherwise than by way of licence.
and as to lands, save also in so far as they are temples sites or owned as house site or backyard.
be and are hereby declared to be the property of Government except as may be otherwise provided by any law for the time being in force, subject always to all rights of way and other public rights and to the natural and easement rights of other land owners, and to all customary rights legally subsisting.
Properties shown from “a” to “e” are not to be treated as Government lands. “c” and “d” are relevant for the purpose of this case.
6. When the District Registrar, Kadapa, sought for clarification from the District Collector, Kadapa, the District Collector, issued Circular Reference No.E3/1291/2007, dated 29.04.2007. The District Collector clarified that in view of provision in Section 2(1) of the Act, 1905, any person can claim the rights over the Gramanatham lands. Such clarification would equally apply to this case also.
7. In para-2 of G.O.Ms.No.100, dated 22.02.2014, Government admits that no records are available showing that the lands classified as Gramakantam are the Government lands. In para 4(6), it is stated that the property owned by a private individual or a family in village site, which are used as cattle sheds or for any other agrarian purpose and domestic purpose by way of dwelling houses can be considered to be treated as private property and the persons under whose possession the lands are occupied be allowed to sell away their lands.
8. As evident from the Circular of the District Collector, Kadapa, and the Orders of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 22.02.2014, the lands classified as “Grama kantham” are not the Government lands and that there is no restraint for alienation of the said properties. Thus, the decision of the Sub-Registrar in refusing to entertain the deed of conveyance concerning the properties in Sy.No.294/1 of Challapalli village, is erroneous.
9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Challapalli, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District (2nd respondent), to receive and process the deed of conveyance concerning the property to an extent of 511 square yards in R.S.No.294/1 of Challapalli Village and Mandal, Krishna District, as and when the same is presented by the petitioner and process the same in accordance with the provisions of Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 without raising the objection that the land is classified as Government land. The Sub-Registrar shall complete the registration formalities, if the documents are in order and to release the same. If the Sub-Registrar has any other valid reason for not entertaining the documents, he shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the parties. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date : 13.08.2014 kkm HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO kkm WRIT PETITION No.22317 of 2014 DATE: 13.08.2014
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sabbineni Butchiramaiah vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao