Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sabari vs State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|19 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the defacto-complainant have filed a joint compromise memo dated 09.06.2017, duly signed by the petitioner, defacto- complainant and the counsel for the petitioner, in which it is stated that the petitioner and the defacto-complainant have now arrived at a compromise and both of them have decided to settle all their issues among themselves. It R.MAHADEVAN, J., sr is also stated in the joint compromise memo that the defacto-complainant is not willing to pursue the complaint any further.
2. Both the parties are present. Their identities have been verified and they accepted the contents in the joint compromise memo as true and genuine.
3. The joint compromise memo is recorded and the same shall form part of this order. In view of the joint compromise memo, the proceedings in C.C.No.46 of 2016 pending on the file of Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore against the petitioner, is quashed, and the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of in terms of the joint compromise memo. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes/No 19.06.2017 Internet : Yes/No sr To
1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (west), Coimbatore City Coimbatore
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.
Crl.O.P.No.3552 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sabari vs State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan