IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1083 OF 2011 Between:
1. Smt. S.V. Puttamma W/o late Venkateshaiah Residing at No.612 4th Cross, II Block Banashankari 1st Stage Bangalore – 560 019 Since deceased represented by LRs 2. Sri S.V. Sridharamurthy S/o late Venkateshaiah Since deceased represented by his LRs 2(a) Smt. Hemalatha W/o Late S.V. Sridharamurthy Age 60 years 2(b) Raghavendra Prasas S/o Late Sridharamurthy Age 30 years Both areresiding at No.612, 4th Cross, II Block Banashankari 1st Stage Bangalore – 560 019 ...Appellants (by Shri H. Ramachandra, Advocate) And:
1. S.V. Suresh S/o late Sri Venkateshaiah Age 60 years Residing at No.45 1st Floor, 1st Cross Opposite: S B I Kumaraswamy Layout, J P Nagar Bangalore – 560 078 2. Smt. Sudhamani D/o late Venkateshaiah Age 52 years Residing at No.52, Old No.30, 10th Main 1st Cross, GBR Colony Banashankari I Stage Bangalore – 560 050 (by Shri Dayananda Hiremath, Advocate for R1; M/s. Southern Law Associates, Advocate R2) ...Respondents This Regular First Appeal is filed under sec.96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 24.03.201 passed in OS No.1652/2002 on the file of the XLIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, CCH-44, Bangalore partly decreeing the suit for the partition and separate possession in respect to plaintiff No.2 and partly dismissing the suit with respect to plaintiff No.1 This appeal coming on for Orders this day, the court delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties have been settled. A memo has been filed to that effect. The memo is signed by the parties and their learned counsel. In the memo stated that at the intervention of relatives, friends, elders and well-wishers, the parties have settled their dispute by entering into an agreement on 9th March 2017 and decided to sell Schedule A and B properties and divide the sale consideration received from the prospective purchasers among themselves in the ratio mentioned in the agreement dated 9th March 2017. Memo is placed on record. In the light of the submission and also in the light of the memo filed, this appeal stands disposed of in terms of the memo.
Sd/- JUDGE lnn