IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.11624 of 2005 And W.P.M.P.No.12665 of 2005 S.Sreekantaiah ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.8919/04/A dated 31.12.2004 and quash the order passed therein and direct the respondents to settle all the terminal and pensionary benefits of the petitioner with all consequential benefits within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ravi For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
21.09.2017 pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To
1. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri.
W.P.No.11624 of 2005 And W.P.M.P.No.12665 of 2005