Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

S Sikindar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

High Court Of Telangana|27 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.36201 of 2014 Between:
S. Sikindar PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and another.
RESPONDENTS ORDER:
The petitioner herein sought for a writ of mandamus for declaring the non-consideration of his Application dated 21.10.2014 submitted for grant of pattadar pass book and title deed for his land in an extent of Ac.9.01 cents in Survey No.30 of Thukivakam Village of Renigunta Mandal in Chittoor District, as illegal.
It is appropriate to notice that in terms of Section 4 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 any person acquiring by succession or survivorship or inheritance or by partition or by way of a decree from a Court any right as owner, pattadar, mortgagee, occupant or tenant of a land, shall intimate, in writing, his acquisition of such right to the Mandal Revenue Officer within 90 days from the date of such acquisition and then, the Mandal Revenue Officer shall give an acknowledgment of the receipt of such intimation. Thereafter, under Section 5 of the said Act, the Mandal Revenue Officer shall determine as to whether and if so, in what manner, the record of rights may be amended in consequence of the Application made and carry out the necessary amendment in the record of rights in accordance with such determination. It will also be appropriate to notice that Rules were also framed in 1989 for giving effect to the provisions of the Act. As per Rule 9, after due completion of enquiry, the recording authority shall pass orders in respect of cases requiring change of registry necessitated by succession, when it is not disputed. Form VI (A) is prescribed as the proper form for indicating intimation of acquisition of rights in terms of Section 4 of the Act, as per sub-rule (2) of Rule 18 of the Rules.
The petitioner has submitted the Application in Form VI (A) on 21.10.2014 to the recording authority, the Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal, the 2nd respondent herein. Therefore, the 2nd respondent shall deal with the Application of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, within a maximum period of four months, at any rate, before the end of March, 2015.
With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if any shall also stand disposed of.
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.
27th November, 2014 Js.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Sikindar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2014
Judges
  • Nooty Ramamohana Rao