IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT APPEAL No.276 OF 2012 (CS-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT APPEAL No.275 OF 2012 IN W.A.No.276 OF 2012 BETWEEN:
S S PEERAN SON OF S M PEERAN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS M D TOWERS, NO.22, ALBERT CROSS ROAD BEHIND BANK OF INDIA BENGALURU-560 025. ….APPELLANT (BY SRI. ARVIND M NEGLUR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (URBAN BANK) NO.1 ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-52.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-52.
3. AMANATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD AMANTH HOUSE NO.43, HOSPITAL ROAD SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU-01.
4. SHRI K P APPANNA JRCS(RETD) AND THE INQUIRY OFFICER NO.99, NANJAPPA LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BENGALURU. ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1 AND R-2 SRI. R. KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 R-4 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN WRIT PETITION No.1736 OF 2011 DATED 04.11.2011.
IN W.A.No.275 OF 2012 BETWEEN:
AZEEZ MOHAMMAD SON OF MOHAMMAD DADA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS M D TOWERS, NO.84 2ND MAIN ROAD, N T PET BENGALURU-560 002. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ARVIND M NEGLUR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (URBAN BANK) NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-52.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-52.
3. AMANATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD AMANTH HOUSE, NO.43, HOSPITAL ROAD SHIVAJI NAGAR BENGALURU-01.
4. SHRI K P APPANNA JRCS(RETD) AND THE INQUIRY OFFICER NO.99, NANJAPPA LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BENGALURU. .. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1 AND R-2; SRI. R. KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 R-4 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION No. 1736 OF 2011 DATED 04.11.2011 THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant.
It is apparent that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals. Hence, the appeals are dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rs