IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.12724-27/2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. S. ROHITH S/O SHIVALINGU AGEDA BOUT 37 YEARS R/AT #223, 1ST G CROSS 4TH BLCOK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079 2. SHANTHA C/O SWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.6/2, 3RD CROSS SHAKATHIGANAPATHINAGARA BASAVESHAWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079 3. SWAMY S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT #152, 1ST FLOOR 1ST MAIN ROAD, J.B.KAVAL NANDANI LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 096 4. Y MALLAGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKAIDHAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT # 113, 1ST MAINROAD 2ND CROSS, MAHADESHWERA LAYOUT METAGALLI POST MYSORE-570 016.
... PETITIONERS (By Sri. CHRISTOPHER NOEL.A, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY IT SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE HOUSING BOARD COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD BANGALORE-560 009.
... RESPONDENTS (By Sri.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA ) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO ALLOT VACANT SITES/HOUSES I.E., HOUSE NOS. MIG-189, HIG - 85, HIG - 86 AND HIG - 87 AT KENGARI BANDEMATTA, KHB BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-B TO B3.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Mr. Chistorpher Noel.A, learned Counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the matters are heard finally.
2. In these writ petitions, petitioners, inter alia, seeks direction to 2nd respondent to allot house NOs.MIG- 189, HIG-85, HIG-86 and HIG-87 at Kengari Bandematta, KHB, Bangalore.
3. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that with regard to their grievance, petitioners have submitted representations to respondent No.2 and direction be issued to the 2nd respondent to consider their representations and decide the same by a speaking order in a fixed time limit.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 submits that suitable decision on the representation, if not already taken, shall be taken expeditiously.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by the petitioners by a speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the cases.
Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.