Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Renuka No 33 Hig Ii 3Rd Main Road Nolambur Mogappair West Chennai 37 vs The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram 2 The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Residency Late Bapineedu Kosaraaju C 102 Nandanam Apartments Fatesh Sultan Lane ,The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Residency Late Bapineedu Kosaraaju C 102 Nandanam Apartments Fatesh Sultan Lane

Madras High Court|20 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.6.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.3859 of 2017 S.Renuka No.33 HIG-II 3rd Main Road Nolambur Mogappair West Chennai-37 ... PETITIONER Vs.
1 The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.
2 The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.
3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Division Tambaram.
4 The Tahsildar Sholinganallur Tahsildar Office Sholinganallur Chennai.
5 Tamilarasi Pandian W/o Pandian A2/13 Tristar Residency Mogappair Eri Street Chennai-37
6 M/s Sobha Rani Kosaraaju D/O Late Bapineedu Kosaraaju C-102 Nandanam Apartments Fatesh Sultan Lane, Hyderabad- 500 001.
7 Mrs.Laxmi Swarupa W/o S.Ravindra Reddy 205 Oakyard Apartments 38th Cross East End C Main Road 9th block Jaya Nagar Bangalore.
8 Mr.Challa Uma Maheswar Reddy S/o Challa Mall Reddy Edulavaripalem Muthukur Mandal Nellore District-524 346 Andhra Pradesh.
9 D.V.Shiva Prasad S/o D.Reddappa Reddi Plot No.897 Road No.
46 Jubilee Hills Hyderabad.
10 Mr.P.Ayyathurai S/o Periathambi 2/202 Kovur Village Sriperumpudur Taluk, Chengai MGR District. ... RESPONDENTS Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to keep the land in Survey No.143/6, 143/6B under the Urban Land Ceiling category by implementing the order of the 3rd respondent in his proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.2411 2012/Q dated 24/08/2012 by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 22/11/2016 For Petitioner : Mr.V.Neethidurai Mr.Sai Bharathi Ilan For Respondents 1to4 : Mr.N.Srinivsan, A.G.P.
*****
O R D E R
According to the petitioner, petitioner is the owner of property comprised in survey No.143/6, 143/6B measuring an extent of 1200 sq.ft. situate in Plot No.57-A, Manimegalai Nagar, Karapakkam Village, Sochinganallur Taluk. The petitioner purchased the said property vide sale deed in Doc.No.11415/1997. Now, the petitioner came to know that aforesaid land has been declared as surplus land under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Petitioner being an innocent purchaser entitled to get benefit under G.O.Ms.No.649, dated 29.7.1998. Hence, the petitioner made representation to the third respondent. Inspite of the said representation, no response from the respondents to implement the order of the third respondent. Hence, the present writ petition.
2 As directed by this Court, the fourth respondent filed status report stating that pursuant to the incumbent Tahsildar assumed office has requested the Assistant Commissioner (ULT), Alandur to furnish details of the property comprised in survey No.143/6A, 6B and 6C. On the basis of the report received from the Assistant Commissioner (ULT), only lands in survey No.143/6B1 and 143/6B3 have been declared as surplus lands.
3 The learned Special Govt. Pleader submits that originally lands in survey No.143/6B was subsequently subdivided into 143/6B1, 6B2 and 6B3, B1 and B3 were declared as surplus lands acquired under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act. In so far as the land belongs to the petitioner is concerned, its survey No.143/6C is classified as patta land.
4 However, petitioner has requested this Court to grant liberty to place all the facts before the 4th respondent/Tahsildar to establish that the petitioner's property is comes under survey No.143/6B and she is in possession of the said property. Petitioner also produce relevant documents before the 4th respondent to prove that the petitioner's property comes under survey No.143/6B.
5 In the light of the above said fact, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 22.11.2016 and pass appropriate orders after providing opportunity to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
6 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.
20.6.2017 Speaking / Non Speaking order Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vaan To
1 The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.
2 The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.
3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Division Tambaram.
4 The Tahsildar Sholinganallur Tahsildar Office Sholinganallur Chennai.
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
vaan W.P.No.3859 of 2017 Dated: 20.6.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Renuka No 33 Hig Ii 3Rd Main Road Nolambur Mogappair West Chennai 37 vs The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram 2 The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Residency Late Bapineedu Kosaraaju C 102 Nandanam Apartments Fatesh Sultan Lane ,The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Revenue Residency Late Bapineedu Kosaraaju C 102 Nandanam Apartments Fatesh Sultan Lane

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar