The petitioner's daughter Ms.K.r.Manjari is doing III year Engineering (EEE) Course in the 3rd respondent's College. After Pongal holidays, she returned to the College on 23.01.2017, however, she did not report to the College on 23.01.2017 and reported only on 24.01.2017. Since the petitioner's daughter failed in a few subjects, the petitioner's family advised her to study well and complete the degree in time. In view of that, she was disturbed. Therefore, it seems, she stayed with her cousin Mr.Mahi on the day without informing the petitioner and thereafter she reported to the College only on 24.01.2017. Due to the above incident, the 3rd respondent College is not permitting the petitioner's daughter to continue her studies. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation to the 2nd respondent on 20.02.2017 and to the 4th respondent on 21.02.2017. Inspite of that, the respondents 3 and 4 are not permitting the petitioner's daughter to continue her studies. Further, the 1st respondent has issued a communicated dated 23.02.2017 addressed to the 4th respondent informing the College that they should not prevent the students from attending the classes without getting sanction from the Anna University. Even after the communication dated 23.02.2017, the 3rd and 4th respondents are not permitting the petitioner's daughter to attend the classes, which compelled the petitioner to approach this Court.
2. Heard Mr.R.Prabudoss, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents and Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd and 4th respondents.
3. Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd and 4th respondents would submit that the Institution has got no objection in allowing the petitioner's daughter to continue her studies as a day scholar and there is no possibility of accommodating her in the hostel. The learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed for the same.
4. The 3rd and 4th respondent seem to have taken a decision in the interest of the Institution to accommodate the petitioner's daughter only as a day scholar and moreover, it is the discretion of the 3rd and 4th respondents in this regard. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same.
5. Taking into consideration the overall situation, it is appropriate for the petitioner's daughter to be accommodated in the 3rd and 4th respondents College as a day scholar, which the 3rd respondent has also agreed.
6. The learned counsel for the 3rd and 4th respondents would submit that the student can report to the College tomorrow itself viz., 15.03.2017 as a day scholar. The petitioner's daughter Ms.K.R.Manjari, is directed to report to the 3rd and 4th respondents College on 15.03.3017 at 09.00 a.m. and the respondents 3 and 4 are directed to allow the petitioner's daughter to continue her course.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
14.03.2017 rg Note: Issue today To 1 The Registrar, Anna University Guindy, Chennai 600 025.
2. The Director Students Affairs Anna University, Guindy, Chennai 600 025.
3. The Correspondent Vivekananda College of Technology for Women Edlampalayam Tiruchengode Taluk Namakkal District.
4. The Principal Vivekananda College of Technology for Women Edlampalayam Tiruchengode Taluk Namakkal District.
N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.
rg W.P.No.5747 of 2014 15.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in