Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Ravichandran vs The Govt Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Madras High Court|17 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no instructions from his client to prosecute the writ petition.
2. In view of the same, this Court has no option except to close the writ petition as “No instructions”. Therefore, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
17.11.2017 Index : yes/No Internet : Yes gmd/gsk To
1. The Secretary, The Govt of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MC.3) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
3. The Commissioner of Chengalpattu Municipality, Chengalpattu.
W.P.No.40199 of 2006
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Ravichandran vs The Govt Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
17 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.