Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Ramalingam vs The Commissioner Of Municipal Administration And Others

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
05.09.2017 msvm To
1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2. The Commissioner, Municipal Office Road, Contonment, Trichirapalli.
3. The Assistant Commissioner, Trichirappalli Corporation, Ponmalai Division, Trichy-4.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
msvm W.P.No.35445 of 2004 05.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Ramalingam vs The Commissioner Of Municipal Administration And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani