IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.F.A.NO.965 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
Smt. S.Radhamma W/o Sri Puttaswamy Aged about 61 years No.194, “Venkateshwara Nilayam” 4th Cross, Balaji Street Ramamurthy Nagar Bengaluru – 560 016 …Appellant (By Sri J.Giriraj, Advocate)(Absent) AND:
Sri G.L.Venkatagiriyappa Since dead by his LRs 1. Smt. Ramakka W/o Late G.L.Venkatagiriyappa Aged about 88 years R/at No.113, IX Cross III Main Road, Chamarajpet Bengaluru – 560 018 2. Smt. G.V.Saroja W/o Bheemaraju D/o Late G.L.Venkatagiriyappa Aged about 54 years R/at No.113, IX Cross III Main Road, Chamarajpet Bengaluru – 560 018 ... Respondents This RFA is filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 10.01.2002 passed in O.S.No.7549/1991 on the file of the XI Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru city, decreeing the suit for Specific Performance.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER The appellant’s counsel is absent. Order dated 27.06.2018 shows that three weeks time was granted for removal of office objections on payment of cost of Rs.250/-. Again on 18.07.2018, one week time was granted finally. Inspite of sufficient time being given, office objections have not been removed, cost is also not paid. Therefore, appeal is dismissed.
KMV/-
Sd/- JUDGE