Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S. Parimala vs Inspector General Of ...

Madras High Court|03 April, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Petitioners have filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to take proceedings under sections 82 and 83 of the Indian Registration Act and also as per the order of the 2nd respondent dated 20.06.2016, within a reasonable time to cancel the document No.4718/2012 on the file of SRO, Velachery.
2. It is brought to the notice of this court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by order dated 20.06.2016 the 2nd respondent found that the Document No.4718/2012 on the file of SRO Velachery is a forged document and also directed the 3rd respondent to initiate proceedings under sections 82 and 83 of the Indian Registration Act.
3. Though this order was passed by the 2nd respondent on 20.06.2016, the 3rd respondent has not taken any action as directed by the 2nd respondent sofar.
4. In these circumstances, I direct the 3rd respondent to comply with the directions of the 2nd respondent dated 20.06.2016 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
03.04.2017 Index : Yes/No Rj To
1. Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai  600 004.
2. District Registrar(Administration) of South Chennai(in the cadre of Assistant I.G of Registration) Rajaji Salai, Chennai  600 001.
3. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery, Chennai  42.
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
Rj W.P.No.5361 of 2017 03.04.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S. Parimala vs Inspector General Of ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 April, 2017