Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Nirmala [ vs Tahsildar Panruti

Madras High Court|28 July, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 15.02.2017.
M. DURAISWAMY,J.
rg
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2017, the respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2017, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
28.07.2017 rg To Tahsildar Panruti Panruti Taluk Cuddalore District. W.P.No.19390 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Nirmala [ vs Tahsildar Panruti

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 July, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy