Challenging the order passed in M.P.No.4961 of 2010 on the file of XV, Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai dismissing the private complaint filed by the petitioner, the present revision is filed before this Court.
2. The complaint has been filed on the ground that the petitioner is a daughter of one Chinnikrishnan. The second respondent is the mother of the complainant and the third respondent is the brother of the complainant.
3. The first respondent is the purchaser of the property from the second and third respondents. The allegations made in the complaint was that the property was purchased by the petitioner's father Chinnikrishnan and they are also having right over the property and without the knowledge of the complainant, the second and third respondents have sold the property to the first respondent and thereby cheated the complainants. The complainants have already filed a civil suit in O.S.No.6689 of 2008 on the file of XV Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai for declaring the power deed dated 25.04.2000 as null and void. Considering the above aspect, the trial Court dismissed the private complaint filed by the complainant to seek the remedy before the Civil forum.
4. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties have stated that the dispute between them has been amicably settled and the civil suit is also dismissed as settled out of Court.
5. Recording the submission, so made by both the learned counsels on record, the Criminal Revision Case is closed.
06.01.2017 vsi2 To :
1. The XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai – 104.
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
vsi2 Criminal Revision Case No.1078 of 2010 06.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in