Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Manivannan vs Uco Bank Saidapet Branch And Others

Madras High Court|04 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

R.MALA,J.
Kj When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.01.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 04.01.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
04.01.2017 kj To 1.XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
2.IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
C.R.P(NPD).No.332 of 2016
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Manivannan vs Uco Bank Saidapet Branch And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2017
Judges
  • R Mala

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.