Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Mani vs Padmavathy

Madras High Court|06 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The present petition has been filed in a proceedings under Sections 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act.
2. Earlier, before the trial Court, after evidence was closed, the matter was adjourned for arguments. Pending the same, the petitioner has filed C.M.P.No.1739 of 2013 for producing certain documents and that petition was allowed by the trial Court. Thereafter, the petitioner has not take any effective steps to mark the documents. Now once again after four years, he filed the present petition in C.M.P.No.6339 and 6340 of 2016 to re-open the case and to produce the documents. The learned Judicial Magistrate, after considering all the materials has come to the conclusion that the petition is deliberately filed to drag on the proceedings and dismissed the petition. Hence, I find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track No.1, Coimbatore.
3. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.
06.02.2017 rrg
V.BHARATHIDASAN.J
rrg Crl.O.P.No.2408 of 2017 06.02.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Mani vs Padmavathy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 February, 2017
Judges
  • V Bharathidasan