Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

S M Saxena vs Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20774 of 2018 Petitioner :- S M Saxena Respondent :- Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mayank Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the respondent-department.
The petitioner is faced with an assessment. From the contents it is neither provisional nor final assessment. Nevertheless, it is an assessment.
We allow the petitioner fifteen days time to file an objection against it. In case, the petitioner files an objection within the period as stated above, the same may be decided within next fifteen days in accordance with law.
For a period of one month, or till the objection is decided, whichever is earlier, no coercive action may be taken against the petitioner.
The Writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S M Saxena vs Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Mayank Kumar Agrawal