Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

S L Geethanjali W/O Late vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|05 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.32958/2018 (LA-RES) BETWEEN S.L.Geethanjali W/o. Late S.C.L.N.Murthy, Aged about 74 years, R/o ‘Sai Sadana’, Temple Street, Sakleshpura Taluk, Hassan District-573 134 (Senior citizen benefit not claimed) (By Sri.S.V.Prakash, Advocate) AND 1. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, M.S.Building, Dr.Ambedkar Veedhi, K.R.Circle, Bengaluru-560 001 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District, Hassan – 573 201 3. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (C & B), K.R.Circle, Bengaluru – 560 001 4. The Superintending Engineer, National Highways, …Petitioner K.R.Circle, Bengaluru-560 001 5. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Sakleshpura Subdivision, Sakleshpura, Hassan District-573 201 6. Sakleshpura Town Municipality, Sakleshpura, Represented by its Chief Officer, Sakleshpura, Hassan District – 573 134 7. The Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Officer, Sakleshpura Subdivision, Sakleshpura-573 134 Hassan District.
(By Sri.Dildar Shiralli, HCGP) …Respondents This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the contemplated action of the respondent authorities to demolish the portion of the buildings existing on the schedule property described in this writ petition and taking over the same for the purpose of widening the width of Bengaluru-Mangaluru Road at Sakleshpura Town, Hassan District without following the procedures contemplated under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as one without jurisdiction and without authority of law regard being had to the provisions of Act No.30/2013 and etc., This writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the court made the following:-
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 05.02.2019 seeking withdrawal of this writ petition.
The memo is taken on record.
In terms of the memo this writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as sought for.
The documents produced at Annexures be returned to the petitioners after retaining copies thereof.
Sd/- JUDGE KPS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S L Geethanjali W/O Late vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
05 February, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit