IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.46696/2017 (GM-RES-PIL) BETWEEN:
S.K.KOWSHIK, M.COM S/O SRI T.R.SEETHARAMAIAH SHASTRY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D.NO.23, 1ST FLOOR, 17TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM, SIDDASHRAMA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 003 ...PETITIONER (PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE PRESIDENT, SRI SIDDASHRAMA NO.13, SIDDASHRAMA ROAD 17TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE – 560 003 3. THE COMMISSIONER B.B.M.P, N.R.SQUARE BANGALORE – 560 002 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, 4TH DIVISION 8TH FLOOR, K.H.BHAVAN K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009 5. KARNATAKA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN PARISARA BHAVAN, NO.49 CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE – 560 001 6. DIVISIONAL MANAGER KARURU VYSHYA BANK NO.230/2, SAMPIGE ROAD MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE – 560 003 7. THE GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA [ERSTWHILE SBM] 2ND MAIN ROAD VYALIKAVAL BRANCH VYALIKAVAL BANGALORE – 560 003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.SREENIDHI, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4;
SRI H.M.MAHABALESHWARA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI JAGADISH D.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SANCTIONED PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND GANESHA TEMPLE IN THE PROPERTY BEARING NO.13, MEASURING 50’ x 40’ VIDE ANNEXURE-0-1 AND ALSO IN SITE NO.47, MEASURING 50’ x 20’ SRI RAMA CHAITANYA SEVASHARAMA CHOULTRY CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING SANCTION PLAN AND LEAVING PARKING SPACE/SET BACK IN THE BUILDING WHICH ARE UNAUTHORIZED AND ILLEGAL UPON THE PROPERTIES OF LATE SHRI RAMA MURTHY SWAMIJI, WHICH DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PROCURED BY PETITIONER FROM THE RTI ACT-2005 AND PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURES-L AND L1 COLLECTIVELY ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Petitioner who appears in person submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing respondent No.3 – the Commissioner, BBMP to consider his representations dated 10.05.2016 and 22.05.2017, copies of which are produced as Annexures-X and Y.
2. Sri V.Sreenidhi, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that the aforesaid representations will be considered by respondent No.3 in accordance with law and an endorsement will be issued to the petitioner within four weeks from today. His submission is placed on record.
3. In view of the above, the petitioner submits that no further order is necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE LB