Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Girija vs Union Of India And Others

Madras High Court|13 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.02.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.16181 of 2013 S.Girija ...Petitioner Versus
1. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Shram Shakti Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi – 110001.
2. The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi – 110 066.
3. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation's Regional Office, Sub Account Office, Group -51, No.3, Rajaji Salai, Municipal Building, Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045.
4. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Orgainsation's, Regional Office, 13, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road, Bangalore – 560 025.
5. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Bhavishya Nidhi Bavan, Ashok Vihar Colony, Phase-I, Pahadiya, Varanasi (UP), Pin – 221 007.
6. The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, South Zone, Hyderabad, No.3-4-763., Barkatpura Chaman, Hyderabad, Andhrapradesh – 500 027.
7. The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, North Zone, (New Delhi), 30-31, Institutional Area (Opp. D-Block), Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110 052. .. Respondents Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to credit the petitioner's P.F. Accumulations collected during the period of her service with Rajghat Besant School, K.F.I. Raghat Fort Varanasi – 221 001 from 01.07.1992 to 31.05.1998 under Account No.UP/18017/195 with interest at 12% per annum in her P.F. Account No.T.N./TBM/61028/08 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sriraman For RR3 : Mrs.V.J.Latha, Sanding Counsel For RR1,2 and 4 to 7 : No appearance.
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
13.02.2017 Index: Yes/ No Internet:Yes/No pvs To
1. Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Shram Shakti Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi – 110001.
2. The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi – 110 066.
3. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation's Regional Office, Sub Account Office, Group -51, No.3, Rajaji Salai, Municipal Building, Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045.
4. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Orgainsation's, Regional Office, 13, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road, Bangalore – 560 025.
5. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Bhavishya Nidhi Bavan, Ashok Vihar Colony, Phase-I, Pahadiya, Varanasi (UP), Pin – 221 007.
6. The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, South Zone, Hyderabad, No.3-4-763., Barkatpura Chaman, Hyderabad, Andhrapradesh – 500 027.
7. The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, North Zone, (New Delhi), 30-31, Institutional Area (Opp. D-Block), Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110 052.
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.,
pvs W.P.No.16181 of 2013 13.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Girija vs Union Of India And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 February, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar