Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Anthonysamy vs The Sub Collector And Others

Madras High Court|07 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:07.09.2017 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU Cont.P.No.1469 of 2016 S.Anthonysamy .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The Sub-Collector, Gobichettypalayam, Erode District
2. Mr.Arumugham The Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District ..Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Sections 10 and 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents for wilfully disobeying the Order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15810 of 2015 dated 05.06.2015 For Petitioner : Mr.N.Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL, J.] Heard both sides.
2. It is represented on behalf of the Respondents that the encroachment on the entirety was removed and also that the statement was obtained from the Contempt Petitioner.
3. A perusal of the statement of the Contempt Petitioner taken in the presence of Zonal Deputy Tahsildar on 26.08.2017 points out that in R.S Nos.41, 42 and 43, in Vari Poramboke, there were no encroachments and also at R.S.Nos.39,40,41,42 and 43, there are no encroachments as on today.
4. Today, on behalf of the Respondents, 2nd Respondent / Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District had filed an affidavit before this Court, wherein at Paragraph No.8 he had in a crystalline fashion mentioned that Order passed by this Court on 05.06.2015 in W.P.No.15810 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 was fully complied with on 06.06.2016 in the presence of the Writ Petitioner, who gave statement on 06.06.2016 acknowledging the complete eviction in S.F.Nos.39,40,41,42 and 43 in the Kondayampalayam Village. Further, it is also averred at Paragraph No.8 that regarding the complaint made by S.Anthonysamy (Petitioner) on 22.06.2017 about the subsequent encroachments made by the adjacent Pattadars in RS.Nos.39 and 40 in Vari Poramboke, at the same time, were also removed on 26.08.2017 by the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Revenue Inspector, Village Administrative Officer and Village Assistant by clearing the crops raised therein by the help of Excavator.
5. Apart from the averments made by the 2nd Respondent in the affidavit, it comes to be known that the 2nd Respondent / Tahsildar, Gobichettiyapalam had proceeded to state that suitable instructions were issued to the Subordinate Officials to watch closely in the subject matter in issue to avoid future encroachments. Moreover, he had also stated in a categorical terms that he is closely monitoring the issue of encroachment to ensure that no encroachments will be made in future.
Recording the aforesaid facts and the Affidavit filed by the 2nd Respondent / the Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam, the present Contempt Petition is closed, as nothing survives for adjudication.
(M.V., J.) (P.D.A., J.) 07.09.2017 Index :Yes / No ; Internet :Yes / No ssd M.VENUGOPAL, J.
and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
ssd To
1. The Sub-Collector, Gobichettypalayam, Erode District
2. Mr.Arumugham The Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District Cont.P.No.1469 of 2016 07.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Anthonysamy vs The Sub Collector And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Venugopal
  • P D Audikesavalu