Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rustam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1864 of 2021 Petitioner :- Rustam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Mr.Pradeep Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing counsel representing respondent-1 to 3.
2. Perused the record.
3. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent-3, Assistant Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District- Aligarh to mutate the name of petitioner regarding land purchased by him pursuant to Registered Sale Deed dated 22.07.2015/13.07.2015.
4. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection by submitting that vendor-Shivdhra of sale deed dated 22.07.2015/13.07.2015d has not been impleaded as respondent in present writ petition. Consequently, present writ petition suffers from the vice of non-joinder of necessary and proper party.
5. When confronted with above, learned counsel for petitioner could not overcome the same.
6. In view of above, present writ petition is dismissed at this stage with liberty to petitioner to file afresh.
Order Date :- 29.10.2021 YK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rustam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 October, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Pradeep Kumar Srivastav