Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ruchin Tyagi vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36253 of 2018 Applicant :- Ruchin Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ruchin Tyagi with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 285 of 2018, under Sections 60 Excise Act and 272, 273, 420, 467, 468 IPC, Police Station Mansoorpur, District- Muzaffarnagar, during pendency of trial.
The allegation against the applicant is of making spurious liquor. The applicant alleges false implication on account of enmity with the Pradhan of the village. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 14.8.2018. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Ruchin Tyagi involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 25.9.2018 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ruchin Tyagi vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 September, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Jagdish Prasad Mishra