IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.56684 OF 2018 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
SMT. RUBIYA, W/O MUKTHAR AHMED KANJI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.300 6TH MAIN, THIRD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560043.
(BY SRI V.F. KUMBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAY, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, ZONAL OFFICER, GADAG ROAD, HUBBALLI-580020.
3. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGALORE CITY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING, BANGALORE-560023.
... PETITIONER 4. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, BANGALORE DIVISION, BANGALORE-560023.
(BY SRI N.S. SANJAY GOWDA, ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER PASSED BY THE R-4 DTD:12.11.2018 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-C, DIRCT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER THE BID APPLICATION ALONG WITH TECHNICAL BID OF THE PETITIONER AND TO ALLOT THE GMU STALL NO.CS-29 AT KENGERI RAILWAY STATION TO THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-B DTD:24.9.2018 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri. V. F. Kumbar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri. N. S. Sanjay Gowda, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. In this petition, petitioner inter alia has prayed for the following reliefs:
(a) To issue a writ of certiorari quashing order passed by the fourth respondent bearing No.B/C.79/Catg/Tender/ GMU/Accused No.1, A & B/1/CS-29/KGI dated 12.11.2018 vide at Annexure-C.
(b) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.04 to consider the bid application along with technical bid of the petitioner and to allot the GMU stall No.CS-
29 at Kengeri Railway station to the petitioner as per Annexure-B bearing No. B/C.79/Catg./CS/SBC dated 24.09.2018.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the tender in question has already been discharged on 09.11.2018.
4. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Accordingly the same is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE RD