Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Theivanai vs The Director Of School Education

Madras High Court|04 April, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

W.P(MD)No.684 of 2015 VD.KM.Lakshmanann ....Petitioner .vs.
1.The District Educational Officer, Pudukkottai District.
2.Mr.P.Manickam, now working as District Educational Officer, Pudukkottai District.
3.V.E.Ramanathan ....Respondents.
1.The Joint Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Chennai- 600 006.
2.The Chief Educational Officer, Pudukkottai.
2.The District Educational Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
4.The Registrar of Societies, District Registrar Office, Saidapet, Chennai-15.
5.The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
6.VD.N.Nagarajan, Alleged President, School Committee, The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
7.VD.KM.Lakshmanan, Secretary, School Committee, The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
8.V.E.Ramanathan Alleged Secretary, School Committee, The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
9.Mr.Kannan, Alleged Member, Educational Society, The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
10.VE.Kannan, President, The Valampuri Vaduganathan Higher Secondary School Society, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai.
Prayer in W.P(MD)No.21619 of 2015: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the second respondent pertaining to its order in Oo.Mu.No.228/A4/2015, dated 30.1.2015 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to approve the appointment of the Petitioner as P.G.Assistant in Tamil with effect from 6.1.2015 and to pay all the benefits in pursuant to the same by considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 20.8.2015. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.21620 of 2015: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the second respondent pertaining to its order in Oo.Mu.No.227/A4/2015, dated 30.1.2015 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to approve the appointment of the Petitioner as B.T.Assistant in English with effect from 6.1.2015 and to pay all the benefits in pursuant to the same by considering the representation of the Petitioner, dated 20.8.2015.
Prayer in W.P(MD)No.684 of 2015: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.5053/A4,dated 9.1.2015 and to quash the same.
Prayer in W.P(MD)No.20882 of 2014: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Pa.Mu.No.16292/W4/E.4/E1/2014, dated 20.11.2014 and the consequential order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2854/A4/2014, dated 8.12.2014 and to quash the same. (Prayer amended vide order of this Court made in M.P(MD)No.3 of 2015, dated 4.3.2015) W.P(MD)Nos.21619 and 21620 of 2015 !For Petitioner :M/s.S.C.Herold Singh ^For Respondents :Mr.D.Muruganandam 1 and 2 Addl.Govt.Pleader For Respondent-3:M/s.P.Mahendran W.P(MD)No.684 of 2015 For Petitioner :M/s.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents :Mr.D.Muruganandam 1 and 2 Addl.Govt.Pleader For Respondent-3:M/s.P.Mahendran W.P(MD)No.20882 of 2014 For Petitioner :M/s.F.Deepak For Respondents :Mr.D.Muruganandam 1 to 4 Addl.Govt.Pleader For Respondent-5:M/s.P.Mahendran For Respondent-7:Mr.Palaramasamy For Respondent-8 :M/s.KR.Singaravadivel For Respondents : M/s/H.Mohammed Imran 6,9 and 10 :COMMON ORDER These Writ Petitions are taken up for final hearing today.
2.It appears that there are rival claimants claiming each other to be the representative of the educational agency and each set of officers appears to have disputed election of committee members. On the basis of the complaints from rival parties, some orders were also issued by the educational authorities and the educational authorities have also issued orders resorting to direct payment of salary to the staff of the school.
3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, all the parties to the dispute filed a memorandum of compromise signed by all the parties concerned, settling the matter inter-se between them and impressed upon this Court to record the compromise and dispose of the Writ Petitions in terms of the compromise memo.
4.In such view of the matter, memorandum of compromise is being made as part of the order and all the Writ Petitions are closed in terms of the compromise memo recorded and signed by all the parties to the dispute. The educational authority shall take note of the compromise entered between the parties concerned in the present Writ Petitions and shall pass appropriate orders on the basis of any application being filed by the parties concerned and the decision taken in this regard shall be communicated to the parties concerned within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.
To
1.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai ? 600 006.
2.The Joint Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Chennai- 600 006.
3.The Chief Educational Officer, Pudukkottai.
4.The District Educational Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
5.The Registrar of Societies, District Registrar Office, Saidapet, Chennai-15..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Theivanai vs The Director Of School Education

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 April, 2017