Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.S.Thinakaraj vs The Sub Collector / Revenue ...

Madras High Court|14 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus, directing the respondent to release the Bolero Maxi Truck bearing Registration No. TN-25-AX-1283 seized by the Village Administrative Officer, Vellakulam, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District on 24.05.2017.
3. It is stated that the above said vehicle was seized and handed over to the respondent by the Village Administrative Officer, Vellakulam, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District on 24.05.2017, on the allegation that the said vehicle was indulged in transporting sand in violation of certain provisions under the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules,1959. According to the petitioner, there was no such violation and on the other hand, the vehicle was used only for the personal consumption of the petitioner. Needless to say that it is for the authority to consider such claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders and therefore, this Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the vehicle was seized as early as on 24.05.2017 and the same is kept idle thereby exposing it to sun and rain, which undoubtedly would diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the following order will protect the interest of both parties:
a) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand), before the respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
b) The petitioner shall appear in person and produce all the relevant documents proving the ownership of the vehicle for verification of the authority in proof of such ownership.
(c) On receipt of payment as stated supra and also on being satisfied with the ownership of the vehicle, the respondent shall release the same forthwith.
(d) The petitioner shall not use the said vehicle for any unlawful purpose and also shall not alienate the same during the pendency of the proceedings.
(e) It is open to the respondent to initiate proceedings in accordance with law and pass K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
mk appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(f) If no such order is passed within the time stipulated therein, the amount so paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
14.06.2017 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No mk Note: Issue order copy on 15.06.2017 To The Sub Collector / Revenue Divisional Officer Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.
W.P.No.14866 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.S.Thinakaraj vs The Sub Collector / Revenue ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 June, 2017