Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Srinivasan vs 3 National Highways Authority Of ...

Madras High Court|12 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

. Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to number and hear his arbitration application dated 11.08.2017 sent by registered post under Section 3G (5) of the National Highways Act 1956
3. Mr.M.David Tyagaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed the application dated 11.08.2017 under section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Act claiming enhanced compensation. However, the 1st respondent has not yet numbered the arbitration application and taken up the same for hearing.
4. Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the 1st respondent may be directed to number the application and hear the same and pass orders, in accordance with law.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I direct the 1st respondent to number the arbitration application dated 11.08.2017 sent by the petitioner under Section 3G (5) of the National Highways Act, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and dispose of the same in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of numbering of the petition.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Srinivasan vs 3 National Highways Authority Of ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
12 September, 2017