1. Petitioner has approached the second respondent for effecting mutation of the property in her name with reference to Ext.P1 sale deed. According to her, the second respondent did not take any action pursuant to the same, on the allegation that, Ext.P4 order had been passed by the first respondent directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.2,000/-p.m. to her father. However, by Ext.P6 order, the first respondent had indicated that, if there is no legal restriction, necessary mutation can be effected. Apparently, Ext.P4 order will not stand in the way of the second respondent in effecting mutation of property, if there is no legal impediment.
2. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of as under:
W.P.(C)No.13271 of 2014 -:2:-
The second respondent shall rely upon Ext.P1 sale deed and pass appropriate orders, especially, in the light of Ext.P6 order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
A.M.Shaffique, Judge.
sl.