Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Sai Bharathi vs The State Represented

Madras High Court|20 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.06.2017 dm/rns To The Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic), State of Tamilnadu, Office of the City Police Commissioner, No.132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery Periamet, Chennai 600 007.
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
dm/rns W.P.No.4642 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.4894 of 2017 20.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Sai Bharathi vs The State Represented

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.