Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Royal Sundaram Alliance vs Arul Michaelammal

Madras High Court|03 August, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company against the award made in MCOP.No.5 of 2008, on the file of Motor Accident Claims (Sub Judge), Ambasamudram.
2. It is a case of fatal accident, which took place on 19.09.2007 at about 1.00 p.m., at Tenkasi Main Road.
3. It is the case of the claimants before the Tribunal that one Maria Adaikalam, the husband of the first petitioner drove his Hero Honda Motor Cycle bearing Registration No.TN-72-T-0286. When he came near Mannarkoil Vilakku, the Maruti Car bearing Registration No.TN-76-B-0979 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the two- wheeler and the said Maria Adaikkalam died on the spot.
4. The claimants filed an application in MCOP.No.5 of 2008, on the file of Motor Accident Claims (Sub Judge), Ambasamudram,claiming compensation.
5. Before the Tribunal, on side of the claimants two witnesses were examined as P.Ws.1 and 2 and fifteen documents were marked as Ex.P1 to Ex.P.15. On the side of the Insurance Company, one witness was examined as R.W.1 and five documents were marked as Ex.R.1 to Ex.R.5.
6.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence and the arguments advanced on either side and also appreciating the evidence on record, held that the accident occurred only, due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Maruthi Car, which is insured with the Insurance Company and directed the Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.4,57,000/- as compensation.
7. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Insurance Company and there is no representation for the respondents. This Court has perused the materials available on record.
8. The learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company submitted that P.W.1 the sone of the deceased has deposed in his cross examination that her father was 68 years old at the time of accident and in Ex.P.15-Driving license also the date of birth of the deceased is mentioned as 13.05.1939. But the Tribunal wrongly taken the age of the deceased as 60 based on the post-mortem report, which is marked as Ex.P.12 and if the age of the deceased is taken as 68, the correct multiplier should be '5',
9. I find force in the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant. On perusing Ex.P.15-Driving License, it is seen that the deceased was 68 years old at the time of accident. Therefore, the Tribunal ought to have considered the evidence of the son of the deceased and ought to have taken the age of the deceased as 68.
10. However, there is no error in fixing notional income at Rs.6,000/- and multiplier '5' should be taken into account for arriving at the compensation. If multiplier '5' is adopted, the amount towards loss of income would come to Rs.2,70,000/- (6000 X 12 X s X5). The Tribunal has granted Rs.5,000/- towards loss of consortium. This Court enhances the amount towards loss of consotium to Rs.50,000/- In all other heads, the amounts awarded by the Tribunal shall stand unaltered. Rs.5000/- towards transportation and Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses is confirmed. Hence, total compensation is reduced to Rs.3,40,000/- from Rs.4,57,000/-
11. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed, reducing the award of the Tribunal from Rs.4,57,000/- to a sum of Rs.3,40,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till date of realisation and proportionate costs. The second respondent/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount of Rs.3,40,000/- (Rupees three lakhs and forty thousand only) with accrued interests and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such deposit being made, the claimants are permitted to withdraw their respective shares as apportioned by the Tribunal, with accrued interests and costs, without filing any formal application before the Tribunal. No Costs.
To
1. The Motor Accident Claims (Sub Judge), Ambasamudram.
2.The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Royal Sundaram Alliance vs Arul Michaelammal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 August, 2017