Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Roshani vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 27
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14892 of 2018 Petitioner :- Smt. Roshani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the back of the forged resolution, the decision has been taken to appoint the respondent No.6 as the fair price shop dealer. In this regard the petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondent authorities.
Sri Vivek Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel contends that this is a disputed question of fact which needs investigation by the competent authority in the first instance.
In view of the submissions at the bar the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the submission of a certified copy of this order, along with a fresh copy of the representation.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.4.2018 Ashish Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Roshani vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 April, 2018
Judges
  • Ajay Bhanot
Advocates
  • Ajay Kumar Sharma