Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rohitash vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25032 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rohitash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Garun Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
This petition has been preferred for a direction to the respondents to produce the records in respect of the petitioner, to appoint him on the respective post and to pay him month to month salary as and when it falls due.
This relief is sought consequent to the petitioner having participated in a recruitment process which was initiated by the respondents. Admittedly the result of the selection process was declared in 2016. Apart from a bald assertion in the writ petition that the total marks obtained by the petitioner was more than the cut off fixed and prescribed, no material has been brought on record in support of this plea.
There is also no explanation for the evident and inordinate laches. Consequently no cause arises for issuance of the writs as prayed for.
Writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 faraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rohitash vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Garun Pal Singh