Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rohit Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34882 of 2021 Applicant :- Rohit Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Sri Manish Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.255 of 2021, under Sections 392, 504, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kokhraj, District Kaushambi during the pendency of trial.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The F.I.R. was lodged with the allegation that Rs.32,180/- along with a bag containing collection tab, loan form and register has been looted by three unknown persons. It is further contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant was not named in the F.I.R., his name was surfaced during investigation and the recovery of Rs.7,000/- and a mobile has been shown from his possession. It is next contended that for recovery of mobile another F.I.R. was registered against him as Case Crime No.339 of 2021 and the recovered money belongs to the applicant. It is also contended that even the recovery memo was prepared without complying with the provisions of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Lastly it is contended that the applicant is in jail since 17.07.2021 having no previous criminal history except two cases, which were registered against the applicant along with the present case and in both the cases he is on bail vide orders dated 17.09.2021 and 16.09.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.34157 of 2021 and 34340 of 2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant, Rohit Yadav involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 29.10.2021 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rohit Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 October, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Manish Kumar Dwivedi