Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rohit Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8654 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rohit Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 27.12.2015 awarding adverse entry to him. This order is challenged now after expiry of nearly three years.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that under the Rules of 1991, petitioner has a remedy of preferring appeal against the order, which has not been availed.
In the facts and circumstances, as petitioner has not availed of the alternative remedy available to him in law, this writ petition is not entertained. This order, however, shall not prevent the petitioner from pursuing his right of preferring appeal under the rules.
Subject to the observations made above, this writ petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 Anil
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rohit Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Mahendra Kumar Singh Chauhan