Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47485 of 2021 Applicant :- Rohit Gond Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Parashuram Barnawal,Rajendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Rajendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and lSri Nafees Ahmad learned AGA for the State.
A first information report was lodged as Case Crime No.0247 of 2021 at Police Station-Ali Nagar District-Chandauli under Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, 18(a), 28, 18(c), 27(B) Drugs and Cosmetic Act and Section 419, 420 IPC.
The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandauli, on 19.10.2021.
The applicant is in jail since 20.09.2021, pursuant to the said F.I.R.
Shri Rajendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Phensedyl syrup has been recovered from the applicant. The applicant is a labourer who works with a transporter and was merely unloading the cough syrup cartons. Phensedyl syrup consignment does not fall under the category of prohibited drugs under the NDPS Act. The recovery was made in violation of Section 42 read with Section 50 of the NDPS Act. No forensic science laboratory report has been submitted which confirms that the recovered substance is prohibited under the NDPS Act. There is no independent witness or public witness to the alleged recovery. The applicant does not have criminal history apart from this case. Lastly it is contended by the learned counsel for applicant that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully cooperate in the criminal law proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner.
Learned A.G.A could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Learned A.G.A does not dispute the fact that the applicant does not have criminal history apart from this case.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India).
These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Rohit Gond involved in Case Crime No.0247 of 2021 at Police Station-Ali Nagar District-Chandauli under Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, 18(a), 28, 18(c), 27(B)/1 Drugs and Cosmetic Act and Section 419, 420 IPC be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not influence any witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 Nadeem