IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.21768 OF 2019 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
Robi K. Richan S/o Richan K. Johan, Aged about 22 years, R/at Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital, Boys Hostel, Mysore Road, Bengaluru – 560 074. … Petitioner (By Sri. Saravana .S, Adv. For Sri. D.R. Ravishankar, Advocate) AND:
1. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, 4th ‘T’ Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru – 560 041.
Rept. by its Registrar.
2. Registrar Evaluation Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, 4th ‘T’ Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru – 560 041.
3. Rajarajeshwari Medical College & Hospital, Mysore Road, Bengaluru – 560 074.
Rep. by its Principal. … Respondents (By Sri. N.K. Ramesh, Advocate for R1 & R2 Notice to R3 dispensed with V/o dtd 21.05.2019) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct respondent No.1 university to direct the paper Obstetrics and Gynecology paper-I having Q.P. Code 1098 and Paper-II having Q.P. Code 1099, to be referred to third evaluation in terms of orders ordinance governing multiple valuation vide No.AUTH/III and V Valuation/208/2012-13 dated 15.06.2012 (Annexure- C) regulation and the evaluation to be carried out within a time to be stipulated by this Hon’ble Court.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R Learned counsel Sri.N.K.Ramesh accepts notice for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking dispensation of notice to respondent No.3. Memo is placed on record. Notice to respondent No.3 is dispensed with at the risk of the petitioner.
3. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the parties that the matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.Nos.48194-48198/2018 and allied maters disposed of on 21.12.2018 wherein a writ of mandamus has been issued to the respondent-University to send such of the answer papers of the petitioner, wherein the percentage difference amongst the valuations (two in the case of U.G. course and four in the case of P.G. course, as the case may be) in terms of 15.06.2012 Ordinance as worked out in paragraphs 25 and 26 therein, for third or fifth valuation, as the case may be, forthwith.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the subject matter of this writ petition being U.G course, the respondent-University shall send the answer papers of the petitioner in terms of the Ordinance dated 15.06.2012 as worked out in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the order in the batch of writ petitions referred to above for third valuation, forthwith.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE ag