This Court has passed an interim order on 20.02.2017 and it is relevant to extract Paragraph No.3: 3. In view of the statement made by the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent/Bank within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and thereafter, the respondent/Bank shall consider the case of the petitioner to condone the unauthorised absence within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation to be submitted by the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents made a submission that pursuant to the orders passed by this Court, the writ petitioner has not submitted any representation before the respondents so as to consider the same as per the directions issued by this Court. Thus, an inference has to be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in respect of the grievance sought to be redressed. Further, the petitioner has not complied with the earlier direction of this Court, though the submission was made by the petitioner in this regard.
3. Thus, this Court is not inclined to consider the merits of this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 20.11.2017 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No sk To
1.The Chairman, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhavan, Madame Cama Road, Mumbai-400 021.
2.The chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, No.16, College Lane, Chennai-600 006.
3.The General Manager (NW2) State Bank of India, Human Resources Department, Local Head Office, Circle Top House, No.16, College Lane, Chennai 600 006.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.,J sk WP.No.9897 of 2011 20.11.2017