Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Kani @ Ganapathi Kani vs The General Manager

Madras High Court|14 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. The dispute is regard to the terminal benefits and other benefits which will accrue to the deceased employee of the Southern Railways. In this case it is one Mr. Ramesh, Teacher, who was working in the Railways, died in harness. The petitioner is the daughter born to the first wife/legitimate wife of the deceased employee and the fourth respondent is the second wife. On account of the dispute between the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation and the parties have reconciled their differences and and agreement has been arrived at as follows:
1.The Respondent No.4-Nagarathinam agrees that she has no objection for grant of Compassionate appointment by Railways to the petitioner and the 4th respondent shall not make any claim for compassionate appointment.
2.Both the Petitioner and Respondent No.4 agree for sharing of pending arrears of pension amount due from Railways department till 31.05.2017, arising out of death of Raman who died in service, at the rate of 35% to the petitioner and 65% to the Respondent 4.
3.The Petitioner, agreed to give up her claim on the future pension from the date of 1st June 2017 to the 4th Respondent and R4 shall avail the full pension amount from that date.
3. The only issue which now remains to be considered is with regard to the claim for compassionate appointment made by the petitioner. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent Railways would submit that the application will be processed in accordance with the Master Circular No.16. But if there is any delay in submitting the application or for submitting the documents that should be a reason for rejecting the petitioner application as there has been dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent which led to the filing of the writ petition and ultimately culminated in the settlement dated, 08.07.2006. We sincerely hope that the respondents 1 to 3 will consider the case of the writ petitioner positively and offer appointment on compassionate ground, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the application in all respects. Arrears of benefits due and payable to the deceased employee shall be disbursed at the rate of 35% to the writ petitioner and 65 % to the 4th respondent and such disbursement shall be done with in a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving due credit to the amount already disbursed.
4. Thus, with the above observations, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No Costs.
To
1.The General Manager, Southern Railways, Chennai.
2.The Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railways, Madurai.
3.The Divisional Personnel Officer, Souther Railways, Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Kani @ Ganapathi Kani vs The General Manager

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 June, 2017