IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
RITTAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED NO.23 AND 24, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, VEERAPURA, DODDABALLAPUR-561 203, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, MR. DEBABRATA SINHA, PAN: AAACR7927A.
(BY SRI SURYANARAYANA T. ADVOCATE) ... APPELLANT AND:
1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT, CIRCLE-1, JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET RING ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085.
2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT, JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET RING ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU 560 085.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 09.08.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.420/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012- 2013 (VIDE ANNEXURE-D) PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 09.08.2017 BY THE TRIBUNAL IN IT(TP)A NO.420/BANG/2017 (ANNEXURE-D), TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN; AND PASS SUCH OTHER OR FURTHER ORDERS AS THIS COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
***** THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT In view of the memo dated 8-2-2019, filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rsk/-