Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rishipal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32782 of 2019 Applicant :- Rishipal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard Sri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Regard being had to the fact that the applicant is said to have assisted co-accused, Amit in kidnapping of 14 years' daughter of first informant and is named in the F.I.R. and learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the minor daughter of the informant has not yet been recovered, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicant,Rishipal involved in Case Crime No. 321 of 2019 under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., Police Station Kairana , District Shamli.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rishipal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Avinash Pandey