Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rishi vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42466 of 2020 Applicant :- Rishi Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Varinder Singh,Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the present bail application.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Rishi with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 132 of 2020, under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C., Police Station Shahabad, District Rampur.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is in jail since 16.4.2020 and after investigation, police has submitted charge sheet against the applicant. It is further submitted that he was implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and there is no eye witness account in support of the FIR version and nothing has been recovered from the applicant. It is further submitted that the whole case is based on circumstantial evidence. It is further submitted that accused applicant has no criminal history and he is prepared to furnish sureties and bonds and there is no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the evidence. Applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if granted and cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. He has further submitted that after investigation, the police has submitted charge sheet against the accused.
Upon hearing the submissions made by learned counsel of both sides, considering the contention made above, and without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that applicant is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court concerned to take necessary action in accordance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. or Sections 174A and 229A I.P.C.
(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rishi vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2021
Judges
  • Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Advocates
  • Varinder Singh Dhiraj Kumar Pandey