Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rinku And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7615 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rinku And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Dixit,Anupam Shyam Dwivedi,Deepti Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to stay the arrest of the petitioners in Case Crime No. 148 of 2018, under Sections 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Iglas, District Aligarh.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the dispute with regard to the allotment of a plot between the parties, for which, initially an NCR has been lodged. Thereafter, the same has been converted in the FIR.
It is next contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.
He has further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the F.I.R., which is a bundle of lies and product of malice, no credible evidence is forthcoming, even prima facie, indicating that any such incident had taken place, hence, the impugned F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has submitted that from the perusal of the impugned F.I.R., it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out, hence, the impugned F.I.R. is not liable to be quashed.
From the perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out, hence, there is no scope for interfering with the impugned F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.
However, considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and nature of allegations made in the F.I.R., it is directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case till submission of police report under Section 173(2) CrPC or till credible evidence is collected, whichever is earlier.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 Nadim
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rinku And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2018
Judges
  • Rajesh Dayal Khare
Advocates
  • Sudhir Dixit Anupam Shyam Dwivedi Deepti