Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rinku And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5322 of 2019 Petitioner :- Rinku and another Respondent :- State Of U.P. and 3 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned AGA and perused the impugned F.I.R, as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 5.1.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 22 of 2019, under sections 60, 63, 72 U.P. Excise Act, P.S. Dadri District Gautam Budh Nagar.
Matter relates to production of illicit liquor and the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was not arrested on the spot and in fact his name surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Pankaj, cannot be a good ground to quash the F.I.R. From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie, cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Ram Murti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rinku And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Rohit Nandan Pandey