Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rinku @ Sajid Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7609 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rinku @ Sajid Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ansar Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.
The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash the notice dated 30.8.2017, issued by the respondent no.2, Additional District Magistrate,Etawah under section 3(1) of U.P. Control of Goondas Act, in case No. 23 of 2017, P.S. Kotwali, District Etawah.
The petitioner has statutory remedy to file the reply of the notice issued by the respondent no. 2, Additional District Magistrate, Etawah.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy available to him by filing his reply to the aforementioned notice issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Etawah.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rinku @ Sajid Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2018
Judges
  • Rajesh Dayal Khare
Advocates
  • Ansar Ahmad