Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Revathi High School vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh

High Court Of Telangana|06 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WP :31765 of 2010 Between:
1 Revathi High School, Asifabad, Adilabad District, Rep. by its Correspondent Jakku Mohan, S/o. Narayana, r/o. Asifabad, Adilabad District.
2 The Head Master, Revathi High School, Asifabad, Adilabad District . PETITIONERS AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Director of School Education, A.P.Hyderabad
3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal
4 Board of Secondary Education, Nampally, Hyderabad
5 The District Educational Officer, Adilabad District
6 The Deputy Educational Officer,Mancherial , Adilabad District . RESPONDENTS WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, presented this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 5 and 6 to forward the application filed by the petitioner School dated 2-3-2010 which was submitted on 3-5-2010 to the respondents 5 to 6 to the respondent No.3 for issuing necessary proceedings granting renewal of recognition to the petitioner School and also to direct the respondent No.3 in the meanwhile to issue under process certificate to the respondent No.4 to enable the Respondent No.4 for accepting the ICR forms and Nominal rolls forms of the students who are prosecuting the SSC in the petitioner school in order to issue Hall Tickets to the students for appearing in the SSC examinations which are scheduled to be held in the month of March 2011 or any other subsequent date or month by duly declaring the action of the Respondents 5 to 6 in not forwarding the application of the petitioner i.e., proposal file for renewal of the recognition to the 3rd respondent for issuing necessary proceedings granting renewal of recognition without any valid reasons is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, unjustified and violative of Article 14 and 19(1) (g) of the constitution of India;
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Govt. Pleader for School Education for the respondents directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause why this writ petition should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed in Writ Petition.
You viz ;
1. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Director of School Education, A.P.Hyderabad
3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal
4. Board of Secondary Education, Nampally, Hyderabad
5. The District Educational Officer, Adilabad District
6. The Deputy Educational Officer,Mancherial , Adilabad District are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this writ petition should not be admitted.
..2..
-2-
THE COURT FURTHER MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 16-12-2010, it was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader for School Education to get instructions. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the respondents.
It is stated that recognition was granted to the first petitioner to run the classes from VI to X during 2005-06 and it is expiring by the academic year 2009-2010. It is the grievance of the petitioners that though an application for grant of renewal of recognition, is filed, the same has not been processed by8 the competent authority.
In view of pendency of application seeking renewal of recognition, there shall be a direction to respondent Nos. 3 to 6 to forthwith consider the application of the petitioner for grant of renewal of recognition, in accordance with the Education Act and the Rules made thereunder.
Post after four (4) weeks.
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRARS
1. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Director of School Education, A.P.Hyderabad
3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal
4. Board of Secondary Education, Nampally, Hyderabad
5. The District Educational Officer, Adilabad District
6. The Deputy Educational Officer,Mancherial , Adilabad District ( 1 to 7 with a copy of petition and affidavit. by RPAD) 7.2 CCs to the G.P. for School Education, High court of A.P.Hyd. (O.UT)
8. One C.C.to Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao Advocate (OPUC)
9. one spare copy. Bsr HIGH COURT RSR.J DATED 24-12-2010 POST AFTER FOUR WEEKS.
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION W.P.NO. 31765 OF 2010 DIRECTION Bsr Dt. 28-12-2010 HIGH COURT RSR.J DATED 24-12-2010 POST AFTER FOUR WEEKS.
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION W.P.NO. 31765 OF 2010 DIRECTION
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Revathi High School vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
06 June, 2014
Judges
  • R Subhash Reddy