IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.35963 OF 2019 (GM-RES) Between:
M/s. Resonators Represented by its Partner Srinivas A.P., Having address at No.905/37, 4th Main, 3rd Cross, Vidyaranyapuram Mysuru – 570 008 … Petitioner (By Sri. Gautham Nettar, Advocate) And:
1 The Government of Karnataka Rep. by Chief Secretary Office at Vidhana Soudha Ambedkar Veedi Bengaluru – 560 001 2 The Department of Kannada and Culture Rep. by its Principal Secretary Office at Multi Storied Building Ambedkar Veedi Bengaluru – 560 001 3 The Deputy Commissioner and Special Officer, Dasara Mysuru District Mysuru – 570 001 4 The Superintending Engineer Mysore Urban Development Authority Mysuru – 570 001 (By Sri. Balakrishna B., AGA) … Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondents more particularly the 3rd and the 4th respondent to consider the letter dated 20.02.2019 produced at Annexure-A and B.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary hearing, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri. Guatham Nettar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Balakrishna B, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondents more particularly the 3rd and 4th respondent to consider the letter submitted by the petitioner dated 20.02.2019 contained in Annexures- A and B.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the letter dated 20.02.2019 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents submitted that the letter submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the letter dated 20.02.2019 submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-